card printing decision

This is one of my cards at zazzle.com. They look good, they’re printed well, but really- at 5″ by 7″ they seem a bit large. When I see my stuff that big I get a bit queasy. Lucky for me, the subtler cards that I had printed at moo.com are a bit smaller. And a bit less shiney.

At a tad over 4 inches wide and about 5¾ inches tall, I think they’re just about perfect. The finish is a bit softer than zazzle’s gloss, too, which helps them feel a bit less in-your-face. I have the pen and ink sketches sized and ready, but I’m still a bit hesitant. Moo is my preference, but in reality, I’m not sold on marketing. If I get them, they’ll just sit around in their cool moo.com box and gather dust. Decisions, decisions. Without a real plan it’s just feeling too self-serving.

Even though the sock monkey on the back might still seem a bit “in-your-face,” I’m happy it printed well. I think it beats having my name on the image.

note cards

All of these images have been posted here before. I’ve decided to try having cards made of this assortment. I’ve tried zazzle.com, and actually have a link to their store in the widget column of this blog (scroll down…) They do decent work. I’ve tried moo.com through work and they do great work. Zazzle provides a service to print for customers on demand. Moo prints for me and I get all the cards at once.

The first image here will be a 5X7 card from moo.com. It’s ordered but hasn’t arrived. I’ve already seen how Zazzle.com prints this image, thought it was good, but I don’t know yet about sharing rights. Zazzle gets nonexclusive rights to reuse and mash up my stuff for their own purposes. In return, they provide the marketplace. And print.

With all the other pen and ink sketches, I’m not really sure how they’ll be printed yet. I’d have to order them individually through zazzle.com. Through moo.com I can get them all, several of each, in one assortment pack. I’d keep all rights, but I’d have to manage the marketplace. Geez. Who knows? Either way, they’ll be smaller note cards, roughly 4X5½

Really, I just want to make images. I like seeing them printed, but I like mounting the hand made individual hard copy drawings, too. Ain’t it a shame that food costs money?

moving to a child theme…

The last time I tried to use a child theme, I hosed my widgets and header. It looked great in the preview, but when it went live, it died. I had to get a hold of the help desk to regress my site to an older, but living, version. Now, maybe I should attempt the leap again. I’ve copied the code to my custom widgets, and here goes.

This is just fair notice…

ps: WordPress? This shouldn’t be necessary.If I can pull the css out to another location and it still works, if I can copy widgets to replace them, there’s no reason why a theme can’t back up these same files when updating then read them back in when done. There’s no reason why these files can’t be left untouched. It’s a common problem. If a bonehead like me can get it to work, that’s a clear indication that it’s fixable. Fix it.

Daniel Pink and Badges, part 3

I listened to Daniel Pink open the TLT Symposium with a presentation that confirmed, for me anyway, much of how I feel. His presentation, though, seemed to serve the needs of a Human Resources climate committee more than the needs of educators. So it was both good and not so good; appropriate and confirming, yet out-of-place and disconnected. Though Pink said that cognitive work didn’t benefit from inducements, he also said that badges as credentials are pretty cool. Was that his safe way of saying badges wouldn’t work as inducements?

I have to think so. It sounded like very specific clarification when he said “as credentials.” Especially with the framework of his other points. Instead of badges as motivation, badges could serve as granular credentials.

Anyone doing any work that took even the most rudimentary cognitive effort would respond to intrinsic motivation. Exactly my thought: I’ll learn what I need to know to do the best job possible in an effort to serve my community. Pink asked what motivated artists to “compose,” then by way of answering described the creative being’s categories of intrinsic motivation:

  • Autonomy- The urge to direct our own lives.
  • Mastery- The desire to get better and better at something that matters.
  • Purpose- The yearning to do what we do in service of something larger than ourselves.

Making progress in meaningful work. That’ll do it. I don’t need any badges. After all, who is certifying the badge grantors and the credit they’re supposed to represent? Accreditation would be the big issue. Why should I care what they think of my skills?

I think we have accreditation wrong. BiSci02 taken through World Campus and BiSci02 in a classroom offer two different learning experiences, yet both give the same credit towards a degree. A degree completed through World Campus will represent one learning experience, one completed at Abington Campus another, one at UP still another. All are certified Penn State Credentials. A Penn State credential is different than a Lock Haven credential. Is a World Campus credential different than a Lock Haven classroom conferred credential? That’s getting fairly granular, but that’s exactly the sort of information I’d need. Will badges improve this credential mire or confuse it?

badges in education, part 2

I have a backpack for my open badge badges through mozilla and I have an account on Credly. I’m learning. One small fact that I learned that changes how I view the actual badge: If it’s standards compliant it will be an image in the PNG format, and by design, PNG allows considerable adaptation. One characteristic is its ability to hold extensive metadata. In the case of a Badge.png, the file will contain information about the owner, information about the grantor, the date it was granted and data to help a third party verify the assertion. There can be more, all right there “baked” into that little image. Can it be hacked with a simple meta data editor? I’m not sure. That’s certainly a question for the IT folks.

A question that certainly is NOT for the IT people is, what should get a badge? What does it take to earn a badge, how is that assessed? And how is value determined between two grantors offering opportunity to earn a badge for what appears to be similar successes: Who accredits the accreditors? What is the value to people seeking confirmation of a skill set’s presence? How do you break learning into badge-able chunks? These are questions that need to be addressed by experts who grant badges, instructional designers and educators. It should not default to IT people.

Here are a few resource links:

MozillaWiki/Badges
The badge section in the Mozilla Wiki.
OpenBadges.Org
The primary site. Good information.
mozillaBackPack
Create an account and save your badges here.
Credly
Some of the folks listed as badge grantors do their granting through Credly.

what I don’t get about badges in education

A sock monkey merit badge.To understand anything, my first step is usually finding similar things I already understand and doing some sort of comparison. I don’t get where badges go, who authorizes them, who determines their value, what they mean to people who wear them, or what they mean to people who view them. I’ve read as much online as I can readily find. That didn’t help clarify very much. So I compared them to what I already understand: merit badges in boy scouts.

I was a boy scout when I was young. I had earned a few merit badges and my father was someone who guided, tested and awarded several different merit badges. To get a badge, you picked what you wanted a badge in, then picked up the merit badge booklet for that badge. The booklets varied a bit in thickness based on the complexity of information, but they were all around 6″ X 8″ and ¼” thick. The book had most of the information that you needed to know, and tips for performing any of the necessary activities. The activities were part of the requirements to get the badge. It was all spelled out pretty clearly, but if you had any questions, you could call the person who tested you. Proctor? Mentor? Counselor? I forget what term was used, but counselor seems right. They were experts in the community with some sort of desire to help the scouts. You could call them and ask questions, or just call them when you were ready to be certified and make an appointment to meet. The counselor was the one who decided if you met all the requirements, and if you did, they signed a card that you submitted to your scout master. The scout master kept records, as did the council that the troop was a part of. They awarded the badge.

So a badge was a thing, but it was also an indication that you met the requirements. A certain number of badges, and certain specific badges, were needed to advance to another rank: several badges were needed to make first class, several more to make star scout, more to make life scout, and at least 21 badges (and much service) to make eagle. The process was familiar enough that being an “eagle scout” is a widely accepted symbol of achievement. In scouts, you started out wearing the badges sewn to your uniform sleeveOnce you earned a merit badge, you were awarded the actual stitched patch in a ceremony at one of the monthly troop meetings.

In scouts, you started out wearing the badges sewn to your uniform sleeve. When there was no more room, the badges were moved to a sash that draped over your shoulder when you were in uniform. Here, some of my confusion and much of my prejudice starts: I never put my badges on my uniform. They stayed in a drawer. Other scouts in my troop had sashes filled with badges they were proud of, but I never thought the display was that desirable. I thought it was incidental to the accomplishment, though I didn’t see it as necessarily a negative thing. Just something I wasn’t moved to do. I did, however, wear the gold and silver arrowheads that cubs achieved in cub scouts. By the time I was 11 or 12, that sort of thing lost it’s appeal.

There you go: I associate wearing and displaying badges with a juvenile mentality. It seems badges would be great in education maybe through middle school and somewhat demeaning beyond that. But like I’ve determined, that’s a prejudice on my part. Once past that, I can see real value in vetting more granular skills and knowledge.

I can see real value in vetting more granular skills and knowledgeI’m still not all in though. There’s a few things that gnaw at me. A big part of my negative reaction comes from where the push for badges seems to be coming from. It’s pretty clearly coming from the IT folks, and I don’t get precisely why. I understand part of it- web images are done to a large extent by people who can use and enjoy using graphics applications. After all, that sock monkey merit badge isn’t up there for any reason other than it was fun to think about and render. But other than that obvious attraction, why?

More telling, perhaps, are the media people. Like graphics folks they’re immersed in IT and depend on the tools. Lots of blogs, lots of screen capture videos, lots of social media tracking means lots of engaging work. That’s true. I’ve done my share of tutorial screen shots, and enjoy the different processes. But.

Other than assorted media folks, a number of education technologists are involved with the push, too. I have to cringe because I know that very few people know what the heck an education technologist is. I think it’s someone who knows a bit about both fields: education, and IT. I don’t know why they get a name that calls them out; I’m not a graphics technologist. Friends who do video aren’t media technologists. I’ve been retired for over a year… maybe they are and I’m just out of the loop?

it’s coming from the IT community only because they’ve pretty much been there first and have seen the needAll of these “technologist” flavors have several things in common. They have regular access to the internet. They have at least one device for accessing it. They’re fairly at ease with most regular device maintenance and software use. They regularly include social media in the way they interact with their friends and community. All of that just begins to describe a growing community that sees value in learning small bits in different places to achieve an assumed goal. That’s important to understand. The push to have badges looks like it’s coming from the IT community only because they’ve pretty much been there first and have seen the need.

Got it. Just don’t give me any patches to sew on.

The IT community could do a lot with the knowledge and familiarity with technology that they bring to Education. They get to take so much for granted and just dive in to the work. What does my badge mean to an employer? What does my badge mean to someone with a similar badge from some other granting body? Who vets the badge requirements? Who vets the granting bodies? How are requirements recognized and transferred? Where is the documentation kept? How and by whom is it accessed? Do badges accumulate toward a standard meaningful collection of some sort? What if a student does feel demeaned by a badge – can they opt out? Lots of these questions are actually being answered: check out Mozilla OpenBadges.

A regulation gold star badge.So much to do. Meanwhile, I think this post deserves a gold star.

quick sketch

Flavia de Luce gets Gladys from the bushes.

First thinking-out-loud doodle for Kim. Not so happy with this. I like the odd perspective, but I’m not too happy with Flavia. Rolled up girly jeans made sense to me, especially for riding Gladys- but I can only ever find her in a dress. More doodling required!